
Thoughts on Al Gore
Vernon
Coleman
Al Gore, the self-appointed champion of environmentalism, is
as guilty of wasting energy and contributing to global warming as anyone. His
wonderful 20 room mansion in the USA consumes more electricity in a month than
the average American household uses in a year.
Gore isn't quite the
white knight, saviour of the environment and all things natural that he
sometimes appears to be.
Two examples.
First, when Clinton and
Gore took office in 1993 environmentalists hoped that their administration would
continue the work of energy conservation and renewable energy programmes begun
under President Jimmy Carter. But very little happened and few significant
energy policy changes were made between 1993 and 2001. Coincidentally, Enron
had, of course, made donations to Democrats as well as Republicans.
Second, one of the last things vice president Al Gore did, before
sending away his lawyers, handing America to Bush and joining the political
unemployment line, was to set up, with America's Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), something called the Child Health Testing Program. The published aim of
EPA was to test the danger of chemicals but the people who run the agency
decided not to bother actually testing air, water or food to find out which
chemicals were around in the greatest abundance - and which, therefore, might be
causing the most problems. They decided not to bother warning parents against
which foods contained dangerous chemicals. They decided not to slap any controls
on the way chemicals are used. They decided not to do proper laboratory tests
which would identify the most dangerous chemicals. Instead, as I had predicted a
year earlier, they chose to set up a huge animal testing programme - apparently
believing that this would help them find out exactly what chemicals are toxic
and what dosages are safe for children. It is difficult to define precisely how
stupid this programme is. By comparison, Napoleon's decision to lay seige to
Moscow was a military masterstroke. The Japanese decision to bomb Pearl Harbour
was an exhibition of strategic genius. And the decision to send American troops
to South Vietnam was politically brilliant.
The American plan (as
endorsed by Gore) is a simple one. If chemical A doesn't kill rats (or make them
obviously ill) then it will be deemed safe to put into baby food. If chemical B
only kills rats in large doses then small doses will be considered safe for
babies and children. This is the biggest craziest, most obscene, most utterly
pointless testing programme in history. It is pointless because rats, mice,
rabbits, cats, dogs and so on are all different to one another. And they are
certainly, unquestionably different to human beings. As I have shown in other
books, the evidence clearly shows that tests done on animals are misleading and
cannot be applied to human beings.)
Copyright Vernon Coleman 30th
August 07
Home