
Why The New EU 
Is Like The Old USSR
Many people now believe that the EU is, in many critical ways, now 
indistinguishable from the old Soviet Union.
In a speech delivered at the 
House of Commons in 2002, Vladimir Bukovsky noted the following similarities 
between the old USSR and the EU.
1. Anyone who opposes or deviates from 
the socialist system will be ostracised. For example, when the Austrian people 
had the temerity to elect `the wrong sort of Government' (it was considered too 
nationalistic and right wing by the EU) the EU pronounced the new Government 
unacceptable. With apparent magnanimity the EU announced that it would `accept' 
an Italian President elected by the Italian people. All sorts of tricks are used 
to isolate and marginalise those who opposed the EU. Those questioning the EU 
are often portrayed as insular and parochial.
2. Like the USSR the EU is 
governed by a group of people who appoint one another, are unaccountable to the 
public, enjoy generous salaries, massive perks and huge pensions, are pretty 
much above the law and cannot be sacked. The EU, like any committed socialist 
government, operates without any real feedback from the people, and certainly 
without any concern for what the people think. The state must always come first. 
The only people who benefit (as with all socialist and fascist organisations - 
and the two are, of course, interchangeable) are those who have put themselves 
and their friends in charge. The workers never really benefit from socialism. 
The profits of the hard working, the creative and the thrifty are redistributed 
to the bureaucracy: the lazy, the unthinking and the wasteful.
The 
central planners (in the case of the USSR they were in Moscow, in the case of 
the EU they are in Brussels) insist on making all the judgements and decisions, 
but their lack of experience means that they get everything wrong so there are 
constant shortages and black markets.
State socialism in the EU has not 
led to affluence, equality and freedom but, effectively, to a one-party 
political system. (All three main parties in Britain support the EU and the 
destruction of Britain). The fascist EU has,inevitably, created a massive 
bureaucracy, heavy handed secret police, government control of the media and 
endless secrecy and lies.
The socialist bureaucracy of the EU is run by 
people who arrogantly believe that they are the only ones who need to know and 
that they always know best.
3. There was one political party in the USSR 
(and no opposition) and the same is true of the EU. Political parties which 
don't support the EU are denied the oxygen of financial support. Politicians who 
do support the EU can look forward to good jobs (when they retire or get thrown 
out of domestic politics they may, like Neil Kinnock or Chris Patten, get jobs 
as EU commissioners). The system looks after its own. When the EU constitution 
was being debated the main sticking point among delegates was not the 
sovereignty of their individual nations, or the rights of the voters, but the 
number of delegates each country would be allowed to send to EU meetings. Each 
nation's individuality was pushed to one side as irrelevant and inconsequential, 
in favour of the rights of politicians to attend regular, all expenses paid 
beanos. 
4. Like the USSR the EU was created with little or no respect 
for normal democratic principles. Much of what has happened within the EU has 
happened secretly and without the normal principles of democracy being 
considered or applied. What has happened over the last few decades has happened 
largely in secret.
5. Instead of information about the EU we have been 
fed a good deal of propaganda. The bureaucrats organise and control people and 
they try to control the availability of knowledge. The people are always 
controlled with lies and misinformation. (Today these are known as `spin'.) 
Anyone who dares to oppose the EU or to promote England is likely to be 
described as a `racist'. My book `England Our England' has proved 
enormously popular with readers (and was, within the first year, reprinted 
numerous times) but advertisements for the book were banned by a number of 
publications. Although the book is one of the Britain's bestselling books on 
politics it has never been reviewed in any national newspaper. 
Very few 
Britons realise exactly what has already happened, how what has happened has 
already affected their lives and how things will now develop unless we do 
something very soon. A poll quietly taken for Britain's Foreign Office showed 
that a quarter of Britons did not know that their country was already a member 
of the EU. Astonishingly, 7% of Britons thought that the USA was a member. This 
ignorance isn't unique to Britain. A poll in Germany showed that 31% of the 
public had never heard of the European Commission.
The bureaucrats 
realise that until there is more awareness of and interest in what has happened, 
and what is happening, there are unlikely to be any protests.
6. The 
former USSR was renowned for its vast number of laws, rules and regulations. But 
the USSR was nothing compared to the EU. The EC has become a law factory 
covering everything imaginable and enabling small petty minded bureaucrats to 
hound small businesses and flex their puny muscles. One law on fire regulations 
alone cost UK businesses £8 billion. New regulations have poured out governing 
every aspect of our lives and businessmen have been swamped by an avalanche of 
red tape.
Dairy farmers have been subjected, in the last few years alone, 
to 1,100 separate, specific new laws. Even teddy bear manufacturers have been 
targeted.
Huge numbers of new criminal offenses have been listed. It is 
true that these new laws have to be debated by MEPs but the debates are managed 
at such a frenetic rate - with MEPs voting on as many as 400 issues in just 90 
minutes - that in practice the laws proposed by the bureaucrats are just nodded 
through. Speakers in the European Parliament are allowed 90 seconds to read out 
prepared speeches. And then the voting begins. 
There are so many new 
laws that the British Government cannot study them all. The Council of Ministers 
cannot even read the new laws which the EU passes. The real power now lies with 
faceless, nameless, unelected bureaucrats who have no accountability 
whatsoever.
The unknown bureaucrats in Brussels are so desperate to 
extend their own power and authority, that they have, through the production of 
miles and miles of unwanted red tape, effectively destroyed the European 
economy. 
Our special tragedy is that Britain's economy has suffered more 
than most from these new laws.
The other big European nations (France, 
Germany and Italy) just ignore the rules they don't like. Both France and 
Germany have flagrantly broken the rules on government deficits but for these 
two countries there have been no sanctions, no fines and no penalties. `These 
are for smaller countries,' said a French Government spokesman with typical 
gallic arrogance. The French have ignored hundreds of directives relating to the 
single market (directives which Britain, of course, has obeyed slavishly). 
Commenting on why he had, like so many other Britons, bought a home in France, 
Lord Nigel Lawson (former Chancellor) said he'd bought it because it was such a 
relief to get away from the EU. 
Britain, of course, obeys all the rules. 
And British people and British businessmen pay the ever increasing 
price.
7. It was a crime for individual countries to talk about quitting 
the USSR. Indeed, there was no procedure to enable countries to leave the soviet 
union. The EU is much the same. It is difficult (though not impossible) for 
countries to leave.
8. Corruption usually starts from the bottom and 
works its way up through the system. In both the USSR and the EU the corruption 
starts at the top and works its way down. Corruption was systemic in the old 
USSR and it is systemic in the EU. The EU is riddled with the standard socialist 
form of corruption where the protagonists live by the motto: `what is yours is 
mine and what is mine is mine and I will chop your hands off if you try to take 
it'. This was the popular way of doing things in the USSR. Like the USSR the EU 
operates in a way that ensures the redistribution of wealth. In both cases the 
system means that the wealth is redistributed from the workers to the 
bureaucrats.
9. Like a pyramid selling scheme the USSR needed to be 
aggressive and to continue growing in order to stay alive. If it stopped growing 
it would fail. The EU is the same. It makes absolutely no economic sense for the 
EU to take in small, poor countries. The countries being encouraged to join the 
EU in 2004 are being welcomed for ideological rather than economic reasons. The 
six original members of the Common Market have slowly become 15. Soon the EU 
will have 25 members. And then how many will there be? The bureaucracy needs to 
grow to justify its existence and its demands for increasing amounts of money. 
All bureaucracies like to grow. It is, in part, their raison d'etre. As they 
grow so they become increasingly important. Assistants can have assistants of 
their own. Secretaries can have secretaries. The politicians of the existing 
countries are persuaded that if the EU grows they will have bigger markets. No 
one bothers about the fact that the new countries which join the EU will want to 
share in the subsidies which the EU hands out. Countries like the UK, which pay 
money to be members of the EU, will have to pay more money for even less 
reason.
The new countries coming into the EU have many different cultures 
and laws. Just how they are going to fit into one superstate is something only 
the bureaucrats who have planned the whole thing can explain. (And, as always, 
they aren't talking.)
For example, consider Turkey, one of the new EU 
members.
Under Turkish law, if a rapist marries his victim he can walk 
free. The basis for this is that nobody would want to marry a girl who is not a 
virgin and so the rapist is doing the girl a favour. 
Turkish law also 
allows a mother who murders her child to be given a reduced sentence if the baby 
was born out of wedlock. Another Turkish law rules that kidnapping a married 
woman is a greater crime than kidnapping a woman who isn't married. 
The 
Turkish authorities arrested a young journalist simply on suspicion of being 
linked to a banned political party. For this she was sentenced to 12 and a half 
years in prison.
I mention all this not in criticism but simply to show 
just how much difference there is between Turkish culture and British culture. 
And yet the Turks and the British are expected to be citizens of the same 450 
million citizen country; supposedly sharing customs, mores and laws. Naturally, 
all governments want harmonisation to be organised on their own 
terms.
(The Americans, incidentally, are desperate for Turkey to join the 
EU. They believe that if this happens it will make it impossible for Bin Laden 
and others to claim that the EU is another `Christian Superstate'.)
10. 
In the former USSR the citizens of individual countries were told that they 
should forget about their former national identities. They should, they were 
told, consider themselves members of the USSR rather than citizens of the 
Ukraine or Russia. Exactly the same thing is happening in the EU 
superstate.
The EU is intent on destroying and absorbing national states. 
Britain and England will both disappear completely as the EU superstate develops 
its identity. 
11. The USSR was an ideological dictatorship. That is what 
the EU is. The aim of the EU is the formation of a state, the preservation of 
socialism within the state and the expansion of the principles of political 
correctness. Most political groups which oppose the EU are small, and will 
remain small, because it is virtually impossible to obtain funding or publicity 
for any group which opposes the EU.
In the UK there are just three main 
parties - all of which are supportive of the EU. This is manifestly unfair since 
it means that a majority of the British population must inevitably remain 
unrepresented.
Organisations which represent national interests 
(particularly English interests) are denied power, money and publicity on the 
grounds that they must be racist. Anyone who supports Britain or England will 
find themselves branded a racist. (Supporters of Wales and Scotland are never 
accused of being racist since both these countries will still exist as regions 
in the new EU superstate.)
12. The USSR had a gulag and so does the EU. 
The EU has an intellectual gulag; if your views differ from the `approved' views 
you will find it difficult to get them published. 
Naturally, those who 
disapprove of the EU will find it difficult or impossible to obtain a job 
working for the EU. Making a speech or writing a book which criticises the EU 
(or the laws of the EU) may be regarded as a crime if it is considered 
subversive. (It is, of course, up to the bureaucrats of the EU to decide whether 
or not something is `subversive'.) One Englishman made the mistake of standing 
up at a public meeting and defending the rights and freedoms of English country 
people. He started his speech by saying: `If there is a black, vegetarian, 
Muslim, asylum-seeking, one-legged, lesbian lorry driver present, then you may 
be offended at what I am going to say, as I want the same rights that you have 
got already.' As a result of this satirical comment two police officers visited 
the speaker's home, arrested him (refusing to tell him why) took him to a police 
station and threw him into a cell.
When five Britons visited Brussels and 
drove around the city in vehicles which were decorated with posters which called 
for a referendum on the EU constitution they were arrested for `disturbing 
public order' and `demonstrating without permission'.
13. Citizens in the 
old USSR had to carry ID cards. The loss of civil liberties which this entailed 
used to be regarded with suspicion and some contempt by Western European 
democracies. In the new EU, citizens are losing their freedom and must carry ID 
cards. (It is a myth that ID cards contribute anything whatsoever to national 
security. ID cards always exist for one reason only: to take away the freedoms 
and civil liberties of the citizens who must carry them.)
It is very easy 
to lose your freedom, but very difficult to get it back. 
14. Officers in 
the new EU police force have even greater privileges than officers in the much 
feared KGB. All members of the new EU police force have diplomatic immunity. 
They can walk into your home, arrest you, beat you up and steal your property 
and you cannot do a darned thing about it. Now do you believe me when I say that 
the EU is a fascist organisation? Taken from Saving England by Vernon 
Coleman, published by Blue Books. To order a copy visit the shop on this website 
or any good terrestial or Web-based bookshop. 
Copyright Vernon 
Coleman 2004
back