Vaccine Side Effects (Including Brain Damage)


There are doctors and nurses around who deny that vaccines can produce any side effects at all. There are, they claim, no risks whatsoever. Personally, I feel that any doctor who claims that any vaccine, or any drug, does not produce side effects should be enrolled into a reliable space programme and shot into orbit. He or she is too dangerous to practise medicine and far too stupid to be recycled in any useful capacity. But that's just my personal opinion. The medical establishment, and its very best chum the international pharmaceutical industry, would undoubtedly rather see me fired off into space.

When patients fall ill after being vaccinated the doctors who don't believe that vaccines can cause side effects (and who probably also believe that the earth is the centre of the universe) wave aside any link between the two and dismiss the illness as a coincidence. Whatever happens they arbitrarily decide that it is impossible for any side effects to be caused by their beloved and highly profitable vaccines. What many fail to realise is that vaccination damage may occur weeks, months or years after vaccination. By then the time interval between the vaccination and the damage may be so long that no one connects the two.

If these craven, witless apologists for vaccination were proper doctors, in the tradition of Semmelweiss, Snow, Lister and the other gods of medicine, if they cared a twopenny damn about their patients, or if they had any respect for their profession, they would, of course, report the potential side effect to the authorities and allow epidemiologists to decide whether or not specific health problems were, or were not, associated with vaccination. But sadly, I fear, doctors have already decided that vaccination is far too profitable a side-line for them to risk damaging it by finding out the truth. Tragically, many doctors seem to be painfully ignorant about the vaccines they advocate. They do what they are told to do, unquestioningly and unthinkingly, and check their bank balance every month to make sure that the nice, big, fat Government payments have gone through satisfactorily.

The truth is that of all the forms of drugs available vaccines are the crudest and the most unreliable and the most dangerous. (They are also the most profitable but that, of course, is merely a small coincidence.) Vaccines can cause brain damage - and can kill. I'm always startled that this should surprise anyone. If you inject potentially toxic substances into small children it seems pretty obvious to me that you will get problems. The brain is a delicate and easily damaged organ. The developing brain of a baby or young child is particularly delicate and very easily disrupted. The most significant known fact about vaccines is that they can cause brain damage. And they can kill. This isn't theory or supposition. It is fact. For example, doctors have noticed that there is a relationship between vaccination and protracted, inconsolable high pitched screaming occurring shortly afterwards. This seems to be consistent with a link between vaccination and encephalopathy. This link could be deeply embarrassing for politicians, doctors and drug companies and has not been properly investigated.

Astonishingly, when the American Academy of Paediatrics announced that one in six American children had a developmental disorder and or a behavioural disorder no one mentioned the possibility that vaccines might, just might, be responsible. No one in authority seems to know just why so many American children should be in such poor shape. `It doesn't seem fair,' said one expert. `We look after our children so well. American children have more vaccinations than children in any other country.' Four separate studies have shown that there are higher rates of asthma in fully vaccinated children. Some doctors believe that the epidemic of ADHD (now supposed to be affecting millions of children) could be related to vaccination. If ADHD exists (and there is much doubt about that) then it certainly could be caused by vaccination. And if it is then the children diagnosed with the disease are suffering twice. They have been made ill by a vaccine and they are being treated with heavy medication which is, in my view, too dangerous to use as landfill. And then there is autism which I have dealt with elsewhere in this book and which is, when its most serious form, merely an ill-fitting cover up for brain damage.

When it was announced that from autumn 2008, British schoolgirls aged 12 to 13 would be vaccinated against cervical cancer it was estimated that the contract for supplying the vaccine against the human papillomavirus would be worth hundreds of millions of pounds. But when the vaccine was introduced it was already known that it could cause problems.

Here's a list of some of the side effects which may be caused by vaccination. Not all vaccines produce all these side effects, of course. But, on the other hand, this list is by no means complete and there are undoubtedly other side effects which may result from vaccination: brain damage, paralysis, pain, fever, nausea, dizziness and itching, Bells Palsy, Guillain-Barre syndrome and seizures are just some of the more serious problems. Just how many side effects and problems are there? It's difficult to say. And how common are side effects? That's also difficult to say. Back in 2007, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) detailed 1,637 reports of adverse reactions to the vaccination for human papillomavirus (HPV) including 371 serious reactions and three deaths. Most of the time, however, the authorities (by which I mean the Government and the medical establishment) prefer to sweep the details about vaccine related problems under the carpet rather than to promote them.

Vaccines can even cause symptoms which seem to me very similar to the symptoms of the disease they are supposed to prevent. So, for example, the milder of the `side effects' known to be associated with the flu vaccine include: fever, tiredness, muscle aching and headache. Are those not the symptoms of the flu? (Those, by the way, are the manufacturer's list of side effects, not mine.) A complete list of the possible side effects associated with the flu vaccine may also include: asthma, brain swelling, Guillian Barre syndrome, facial paralysis, damage to eye muscles, damage to the arm and shoulder muscles, bruising, abdominal pain, kidney disorders, hives and anaphylaxis. A study published in the International Journal of Clinical Investigation showed that those who have had the flu jab for five years in a row have a ten fold increased risk of developing Alzheimer's disease. Doctors always seem to forget to mention this when pushing their annual (and highly profitable) flu jab campaigns. It is not known whether the flu vaccine can trigger cancer, infertility or other serious health problems. The body's immune system fights cancerous cells and, indeed, some anti-cancer therapies are designed to boost the immune system and to help it fight a developing cancer. Could repeated vaccinations affect the body's susceptibility to cancer? Could repeated vaccinations make the body less able to deal with a developing cancer? Could the constant increase in the incidence of cancer be a result of the enthusiasm for vaccination programmes which has for decades now been inspired by drug companies and maintained by Governments and doctors? Dunno. But I do know that one anti-flu vaccine which was injected into over a million American citizens contained a cancer-causing monkey virus. Some doctors believe that vaccination programmes are causing insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. The suggestion is that the diabetes does not develop for several years after the vaccination. This theory needs investigating.

In 1998, the Pentagon, fearful of germ warfare, began again to vaccinate all military personnel against anthrax. `We were told to shut up and stick your arm out,' says a former female helicopter pilot who stopped menstruating after the first shot and had by the third of the six shot series lost a third of her body weight. As the vaccines' alleged casualties (including six deaths) mounted so soldiers began to refuse it. Around 400 resigned or were court martialled for refusing the vaccine. The irony, of course, was that only the Americans had the capacity to wage biological war. No one should have been surprised by any of the terrible things that happened in the late 1990s. Approximately 25 per cent of soldiers participating in the Gulf War in 1990-1991 were made sick by the anthrax vaccine they were given. (Incidentally, it has been reported that a component used in that anthrax vaccine was later introduced in one of the swine flu vaccines approved for use in the UK.)

Vaccinations have been linked to a number of other general health problems. It now seems possible, for example, that individuals who receive vaccinations may be more prone to develop allergies (such as asthma), arthritis, eczema and bowel disease (such as Irritable Bowel Syndrome). The explanation - which makes sense to me - is that vaccinations interfere with the immune system and make the recipients more susceptible to disease. The human immune system is a wonderland of protection. It is one of God's great gifts to us. And yet, as I showed in my book Superbody, our immune systems are being battered and broken and damned near destroyed by environmental factors largely outside our control. What if vaccines damage the immune system in some way? We know that when the immune system is damaged people become more susceptible to illness. And more likely to die. Just how much damage are vaccines doing? It is possible, and I believe extremely likely, that vaccines damage the human immune system and, as a result, weaken people and make them more likely to fall ill in the future. People with poor immune systems are more susceptible to infectious diseases and more likely to succumb to cancer. Are some vaccines more dangerous than others? How many people die because their immune systems have been damaged by vaccines?

I still have no idea of the answer to any of these (officially) unasked questions. Your doctor doesn't have any answers either. He'll waffle and burble and tell you that the Government says vaccines are wonderful and ask you, with a sneery, knowing smile, if you really think the Government is out to kill your children and he'll tell you I'm a dangerous heretic. But he won't have any answers. And, remember, he gets paid for giving vaccinations.

In 1998 the French Government abandoned its mandatory Hepatitis B vaccine programme for schoolchildren after more than 15,000 lawsuits were filed for brain damage and autoimmune reactions including arthritis, multiple sclerosis and lupus.

In an infant the brain is developing very quickly. During this time infants are given an ever-increasing barrage of vaccinations. You might imagine that dumping all this potentially toxic stuff into a developing body might put a huge strain on the developing immune system. Scientists have not yet looked into this. I find myself constantly puzzled by the failure of other doctors to question what is happening. Who (other than a drug company spokesman) wouldn't expect an infant to show serious signs of distress when deliberately injected with potentially toxic foreign substances? Why shouldn't such injections cause a severe immune response? What, you may wonder, is the effect of squirting all this gunk into babies and small children? I certainly wonder. And, I hope that one or two members of the medical establishment will one day have the wit, and the conscience, to wonder too.

Meanwhile, as we wait for more research work explaining precisely how much vaccines do, we should perhaps all remember that the American Government has officially recognised that in the year 2010 `perfectly safe' childhood vaccines officially killed or injured 2,699 children in America. And that, remember, is 2,699 children who were perfectly healthy before they had their vaccinations. Those children, and their families, paid quite a price so that drug companies and doctors could make a great deal of money. We should be aware, too, that there are still many unanswered (and usually unasked) questions about vaccination. For example, we know that vaccines cause neurological damage. And we know that the first symptoms of disease may appear some considerable time after vaccination has taken place. `Is it possible,' asked my wife, Donna Antoinette, when she had read an early draft of this book, `that the rise in the incidence of multiple sclerosis (MS) could be a consequence of the increase in childhood vaccination? Could the increase in the number of young women affected by MS be a result of the extra vaccines now given to young girls?' I had to tell her that I have no idea. Moreover, I doubt if any of the gung-ho vaccinators have ever even asked those questions - let alone thought about answering them.

Finally, here is a quote from a former American vaccine researcher: `If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the State if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I'm not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove I would go on the move.'

Food for thought?

Copyright Vernon Coleman 2011
Taken from Vernon Coleman's book Anyone Who Tells You Vaccines Are Safe And Effective Is Lying. Here's The Proof. For details of how to purchase a copy of the book see the shop on this website.

Home